Re: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep

[Stephen Boyd]

On 01/02/14 15:11, John Stultz wrote:
> Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead
> use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep
> enabled seqcount methods.
>
> This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations
> as well, which will be utilized in a following patch.
>
> Cc: Krzysztof HaÅasa <khalasa@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Uwe Kleine-KÃnig <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>,
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/