Re: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep
From: John Stultz
Date: Fri Jan 03 2014 - 19:28:41 EST
On 01/02/2014 04:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:11 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead
>> use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep
>> enabled seqcount methods.
>> This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations
>> as well, which will be utilized in a following patch.
> Ack on this and on 2/2. I'm assuming I'll get them through the -tip
> tree, which is where the problem came from. No?
It seems Peter or Ingo are still on holiday. Hopefully they will be back
on Monday to queue these.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/