Re: [PATCH 0/7] sched: cleanup trigger_load_balance
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Jan 06 2014 - 06:04:13 EST
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 06:19:04PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> I understand. Happy new year !
Happy new year to you too! :-)
> ps : the patchset is based on tip/sched/core
Weird; because tip/sched/core as per today looks like:
029632fbb7b7c kernel/sched_fair.c (Peter Zijlstra 2011-10-25 10:00:11 +0200 6872) void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq, int cpu)
And your patches assume it looks like:
Patch 1: @@ -6878,7 +6878,7 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
Patch 2: @@ -6875,10 +6875,10 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
- int cpu = rq->cpu;
Which obviously doesn't quite work..
So I can make it fit.. but I do wonder what I'm missing here..
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/