Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86: Add Cache QoS Monitoring (CQM) support
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Mon Jan 06 2014 - 17:13:23 EST
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:48:29PM +0000, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 22:26 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:10:45PM +0000, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
> > > There is one per logical CPU. However, in the current generation, they
> > > report on the usage of the same L3 cache. But the CPU takes care of the
> > > resolution of which MSR write and read comes from the logical CPU, so
> > > software doesn't need to lock access to it from different CPUs.
> > What are the rules of RMIDs, I can't seem to find that in the SDM and I
> > think you're tagging cachelines with them. Which would mean that in
> > order to (re) use them you need a complete cache (L3) wipe.
> The cacheline is tagged internally with the RMID as part of the waymask
> for the thread in the core.
> > Without a wipe you keep having stale entries of the former user and no
> > clear indication on when your numbers are any good.
> That can happen, yes. If you have leftover cache data from a process
> that died that hasn't been evicted yet and it's assigned to the RMID
> you're using, you will see its included cache occupancy to the overall
> > Also, is there any sane way of shooting down the entire L3?
> That is a question I'd punt to hpa, but I'll ask him. Looking around
> though, a WBINVD would certainly nuke things, but would hurt
> performance. We could get creative with INVPCID as a process dies. Let
> me ask him though and see if there's a good way to tidy up.
You seem to be assuming a RMID is for the entire task lifetime.
Since its a very limited resource that seems like a weird assumption to
me; there's plenty scenarios in which you'd want to re-use RMIDs that
belong to a still running context.
At which point you need to force wipe.. otherwise its impossible to tell
when the number reported makes any kind of sense.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/