Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: Calling destroy_work_on_stack() to pair withINIT_WORK_ONSTACK()

[Ben Myers]

On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 07:21:05PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> Hi Chuansheng,
> 
> On 01/07 2014 16:53 PM, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> > 
> > In case CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_WORK is defined, it is needed to
> > call destroy_work_on_stack() which frees the debug object to pair
> > with INIT_WORK_ONSTACK().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Liu, Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c |    1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> > index 1394106..82e0dab 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> > @@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ xfs_bmapi_allocate(
> >  	INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&args->work, xfs_bmapi_allocate_worker);
> >  	queue_work(xfs_alloc_wq, &args->work);
> >  	wait_for_completion(&done);
> > +	destroy_work_on_stack(&args->work);
> >  	return args->result;
> >  }
> 
> Thanks for your patch and it work fine for my testing.  I missed this in an
> old commit: [ 3b876c8f2a xfs: fix debug_object WARN at xfs_alloc_vextent() ] 

Looks good to me too.
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/