Re: BUG: usb: obex in g_nokia.ko causing kernel panic

[Pali RohÃr]

On Wednesday 27 November 2013 18:39:04 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 05:40:42PM +0100, Pali RohÃr wrote:
> > > > > > @@ -282,10 +284,12 @@ static void
> > > > > > obex_disconnect(struct gserial *g) if
> > > > > > (!obex->can_activate)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  		return;
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > +#if 0
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  	status = usb_function_deactivate(&g->func);
> > > > > >  	if (status)
> > > > > >  	
> > > > > >  		DBG(cdev, "obex ttyGS%d function deactivate -->
> > > > > >  		%d\n",
> > > > > >  		
> > > > > >  			obex->port_num, status);
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > +#endif
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  }
> > > > > >  
> > > > > >  /*-------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >  ---- ------
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > --------------*/ @@ -372,6 +376,7 @@ static int
> > > > > > obex_bind(struct usb_configuration *c, struct
> > > > > > usb_function *f) if (status)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  		goto fail;
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > +#if 0
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  	/* Avoid letting this gadget enumerate until the
> > > > > >  	userspace
> > > > > >  	
> > > > > >  	 * OBEX server is active.
> > > > > >  	 */
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > @@ -381,6 +386,7 @@ static int obex_bind(struct
> > > > > > usb_configuration *c, struct usb_function *f)
> > > > > > obex->port_num, status);
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  	else
> > > > > >  	
> > > > > >  		obex->can_activate = true;
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > +#endif
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  	DBG(cdev, "obex ttyGS%d: %s speed IN/%s OUT/%s\n",
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi, with above patch g_nokia.ko working and not
> > > > > crashing.
> > > > 
> > > > yeah, makes sense. We shouldn't call phy operations in
> > > > atomic context. I'll see how easy it would be to fix
> > > > that. Real patch coming soon(-ish).
> > > 
> > > I think we could send diff below for the -rc cycle and
> > > figure out a better to handle this for the merge window.
> > > Can you check if it also works with patch below ?
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> > > b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c index 2a408cd..8aa59a2
> > > 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/omap2430.c
> > > @@ -659,7 +659,6 @@ static int
> > > omap2430_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > OTG_INTERFSEL);
> > > 
> > >  		omap2430_low_level_exit(musb);
> > > 
> > > -		phy_power_off(musb->phy);
> > > 
> > >  	}
> > >  	
> > >  	return 0;
> > > 
> > > @@ -674,7 +673,6 @@ static int
> > > omap2430_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > omap2430_low_level_init(musb);
> > > 
> > >  		musb_writel(musb->mregs, OTG_INTERFSEL,
> > >  		
> > >  				musb->context.otg_interfsel);
> > > 
> > > -		phy_power_on(musb->phy);
> > > 
> > >  	}
> > >  	
> > >  	return 0;
> > 
> > Hi, I applied similar patch (commented usb_phy_set_suspend
> > instead phy_power_on/off) on 3.12-rc5 and it working too, no
> > crash. I do not have rebased n900 patches on top of 3.13
> > tree, so I cannot check it. But I think phy_power_on/off
> > doing same as usb_phy_set_suspend in 3.12.
> 
> cool, I'll send this during the -rc and Cc stable, then I'll
> manually backport it to stable later.

PING!

I still do not see this patch in linus tree. What happened?

-- 
Pali RohÃr
pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.