Re: [RFC][PATCH] lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:33:26PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:15:16PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>  > Subject: lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks
>  > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>  > Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 21:45:48 +0100
>  > 
>  > This patch extends lockdep to validate lock wait-type context.
> 
> ooh, a new toy.
> 
> *boom*
> 

Oh cute, I'll have to stare at slub. ISTR there's a current slub-rt
patch floating about.

I'd have to just blindly convert slub to raw_spinlocks (although that'll
get rid of the warning) without trying to limit the lock hold time of
raw_spinlocks.

> nitpick: Why is the backtrace printed twice ?

Because I'm an idiot, lemme fix that ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/