Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] Staging: lustre: Refactor the functioninterval_erase_color() in /lustre/ldlm/interval_tree.c

[Monam Agarwal]

I took n as a flag to decide whether parent->in_left == node is true
or not in the called function.
Should I use some other name for the flag.

On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 04:30:33PM +0530, Monam Agarwal wrote:
>> The function interval_erase_color() in lustre/ldlm/interval_tree.c is
>> too long and can be refactored. Most of the statements are same for if
>> and else conditions. I am passing a new variable n based on which the
>> differences are recognised.
>>
>
> "n" stands for number, but what is the it the number of?
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/