Re: [PATCH 4/7] zram: use atomic operation for stat

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:19:35 +0900 Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 03:58:14PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:18:59 +0900 Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Some of fields in zram->stats are protected by zram->lock which
> > > is rather coarse-grained so let's use atomic operation without
> > > explict locking.
> > 
> > Confused.  The patch didn't remove any locking, so it made the code
> > slower.
> 
> True but it could make remove dependency of zram->lock for 32bit stat
> so further patches can remove messy code and enhance write performance.
> So, it's preparing patch for further step.
> Should I rewrite the description to explain this?

That would be useful ;) I'd ask for performance testing results but I
expect they'll say "no difference".

I grabbed patches 1-3 as they seems appropriate for 3.14.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/