Re: RFC: cgroups aware proc

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Jan 14 2014 - 05:06:04 EST


On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:58:14AM +0200, Marian Marinov wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 07:12 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:23:50PM +0200, Marian Marinov wrote:
> >>Hello Peter,
> >>
> >>I need help with the scheduler.
> >>
> >>I'm currently trying to patch the /proc/loadavg to show the load that is
> >>only related to the processes from the current cgroup.
> >>
> >>I looked trough the code and I was hoping that tsk->sched_task_group->cfs_rq
> >>struct will give me the needed information, but unfortunately for me, it did
> >>not.
> >>
> >>Can you advise me, how to approach this problem?
> >
> >Yeah, don't :-) Really, loadavg is a stupid metric.
>
> Yes... stupid, but unfortunately everyone is looking at it :(
>
> >
> >>I'm totally new to the scheduler code.
> >
> >Luckily you won't actually have to touch much of it. Most of the actual
> >loadavg code lives in the first ~400 lines of kernel/sched/proc.c, read
> >and weep. Its one of the best documented bits around.
>
> I looked trough it but I don't understand how to introduce the per cgroup calculation.
>
> I looked trough the headers and found the following, which is already implemented.
>
> task->sched_task_group->load_avg
> task->sched_task_group->cfs_rq->load_avg
> task->sched_task_group->cfs_rq->load.weight
> task->sched_task_group->cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg
>
> Unfortunately there is almost no documentation for these elements of the cfs_rq and task_group structs.
>
> It seams to me that part of the per task group loadavg code is already present.

No, those are actual load metrics and completely unrelated to loadavg.

Loadavg requires per-cgroup-per-cpu variants of nr_running and
nr_uninterruptible.

Those are the only metrics used in kernel/sched/proc.c for loadavg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/