Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] qrwlock: Use smp_store_release() in write_unlock()
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Tue Jan 14 2014 - 15:20:52 EST
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:09:30PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> I would like to know if the action of writing out a byte (e.g. *byte = 0) is
> atomic in those architectures or is emulated by a compiler-generated
> software read-modify-write.
So on Alpha pre ev56 something like:
*(volatile u8 *)foo = 0;
_Should_ cause a compile error as the hardware has to do a rmw which is
not compatible with the requirements for volatile -- that said I do not
know if a compiler will actually generate this error.
I can well imagine other load-store archs suffering similar problems,
although I'm not aware of any.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/