Re: [PATCH 2/6] perf, tools: Support handling complete branch stacksas histograms v3

From: Jiri Olsa
Date: Wed Jan 15 2014 - 09:49:36 EST


On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 05:04:17PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Currently branch stacks can be only shown as edge histograms for
> individual branches. I never found this display particularly useful.
>
> This implements an alternative mode that creates histograms over complete
> branch traces, instead of individual branches, similar to how normal
> callgraphs are handled. This is done by putting it in
> front of the normal callgraph and then using the normal callgraph
> histogram infrastructure to unify them.
>
> This way in complex functions we can understand the control flow
> that lead to a particular sample, and may even see some control
> flow in the caller for short functions.
>
> Example (simplified, of course for such simple code this
> is usually not needed):
>
> tcall.c:
>
> volatile a = 10000, b = 100000, c;
>
> __attribute__((noinline)) f2()
> {
> c = a / b;
> }
>
> __attribute__((noinline)) f1()
> {
> f2();
> f2();
> }
> main()
> {
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < 1000000; i++)
> f1();
> }
>
> % perf record -b -g ./tsrc/tcall
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.044 MB perf.data (~1923 samples) ]
> % perf report --branch-history

this option is not added in this patch, I tried:
$ perf report --call-graph=fractal,0.5,callee,function,branch

but as I already said in reply for patch 3, it's not working
please update the doc in Documentation/perf-report.txt with an example

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/