Re: SIGSEGV when using "perf record -g" with 3.13-rc* kernel

From: Waiman Long
Date: Wed Jan 15 2014 - 10:33:39 EST


On 01/10/2014 03:06 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

:-)

Something like this perhaps?

---
Subject: x86, mm: Allow double faults from interrupts

Waiman managed to trigger a PMI while in a emulate_vsyscall() fault, the
PMI in turn managed to trigger a fault while obtaining a stack trace.
This triggered the double fault logic and killed the process dead.

Fix this by explicitly excluding interrupts from the double fault logic.

Reported-by: Waiman Long<waiman.long@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra<peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
index 9ff85bb8dd69..4c8e32986aad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
@@ -641,6 +641,20 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,

/* Are we prepared to handle this kernel fault? */
if (fixup_exception(regs)) {
+ /*
+ * Any interrupt that takes a fault gets the fixup. This
+ * makes the below double fault logic only apply to a
+ * task double faulting from task context.
+ */
+ if (in_interrupt())
+ return;
+
+ /*
+ * Per the above we're !in_interrupt(), aka. task context.
+ *
+ * In this case we need to make sure we're not double faulting
+ * through the emulate_vsyscall() logic.
+ */
if (current_thread_info()->sig_on_uaccess_error&& signal) {
tsk->thread.trap_nr = X86_TRAP_PF;
tsk->thread.error_code = error_code | PF_USER;
@@ -649,6 +663,10 @@ no_context(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
/* XXX: hwpoison faults will set the wrong code. */
force_sig_info_fault(signal, si_code, address, tsk, 0);
}
+
+ /*
+ * Barring that, we can do the fixup and be happy.
+ */
return;
}


Are you going to send out an official patch to fix this problem? I really like to see it merged into 3.13 before it is released.

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/