Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] x86: enable DMA CMA with swiotlb

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:13:47PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> The DMA Contiguous Memory Allocator support on x86 is disabled when
> swiotlb config option is enabled.  So DMA CMA is always disabled on
> x86_64 because swiotlb is always enabled.  This attempts to support
> for DMA CMA with enabling swiotlb config option.
> 
> The contiguous memory allocator on x86 is integrated in the function
> dma_generic_alloc_coherent() which is .alloc callback in nommu_dma_ops
> for dma_alloc_coherent().
> 
> x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent() which is .alloc callback in swiotlb_dma_ops
> tries to allocate with dma_generic_alloc_coherent() firstly and then
> swiotlb_alloc_coherent() is called as a fallback.
> 
> The main part of supporting DMA CMA with swiotlb is that changing
> x86_swiotlb_free_coherent() which is .free callback in swiotlb_dma_ops
> for dma_free_coherent() so that it can distinguish memory allocated by
> dma_generic_alloc_coherent() from one allocated by swiotlb_alloc_coherent()
> and release it with dma_generic_free_coherent() which can handle contiguous
> memory.  This change requires making is_swiotlb_buffer() global function.
> 
> This also needs to change .free callback in the dma_map_ops for amd_gart
> and sta2x11, because these dma_ops are also using
> dma_generic_alloc_coherent().
> 
> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Don Dutile <ddutile@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: x86@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> No change from the previous version
> 
>  arch/x86/Kconfig               | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/include/asm/swiotlb.h | 7 +++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c  | 2 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c  | 9 ++++++---
>  arch/x86/pci/sta2x11-fixup.c   | 6 ++----
>  include/linux/swiotlb.h        | 2 ++
>  lib/swiotlb.c                  | 2 +-

It looks reasonable from my perspective (as swiotlb maintainer).

Not too thrilled about the  'is_swiotlb_buffer' but that code is
quite small so it should be fast enough.

>  7 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 0952ecd..1b6275d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ config X86
>  	select ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB
>  	select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
>  	select HAVE_DMA_ATTRS
> -	select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS if !SWIOTLB
> +	select HAVE_DMA_CONTIGUOUS
>  	select HAVE_KRETPROBES
>  	select HAVE_OPTPROBES
>  	select HAVE_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/swiotlb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/swiotlb.h
> index 977f176..ab05d73 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/swiotlb.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/swiotlb.h
> @@ -29,4 +29,11 @@ static inline void pci_swiotlb_late_init(void)
>  
>  static inline void dma_mark_clean(void *addr, size_t size) {}
>  
> +extern void *x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
> +					dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flags,
> +					struct dma_attrs *attrs);
> +extern void x86_swiotlb_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> +					void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
> +					struct dma_attrs *attrs);
> +
>  #endif /* _ASM_X86_SWIOTLB_H */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c
> index b574b29..8e3842f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c
> @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ gart_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *vaddr,
>  		   dma_addr_t dma_addr, struct dma_attrs *attrs)
>  {
>  	gart_unmap_page(dev, dma_addr, size, DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, NULL);
> -	free_pages((unsigned long)vaddr, get_order(size));
> +	dma_generic_free_coherent(dev, size, vaddr, dma_addr, attrs);
>  }
>  
>  static int gart_mapping_error(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dma_addr)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
> index 6c483ba..77dd0ad 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pci-swiotlb.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>  #include <asm/iommu_table.h>
>  int swiotlb __read_mostly;
>  
> -static void *x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
> +void *x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
>  					dma_addr_t *dma_handle, gfp_t flags,
>  					struct dma_attrs *attrs)
>  {
> @@ -28,11 +28,14 @@ static void *x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
>  	return swiotlb_alloc_coherent(hwdev, size, dma_handle, flags);
>  }
>  
> -static void x86_swiotlb_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
> +void x86_swiotlb_free_coherent(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>  				      void *vaddr, dma_addr_t dma_addr,
>  				      struct dma_attrs *attrs)
>  {
> -	swiotlb_free_coherent(dev, size, vaddr, dma_addr);
> +	if (is_swiotlb_buffer(dma_to_phys(dev, dma_addr)))
> +		swiotlb_free_coherent(dev, size, vaddr, dma_addr);
> +	else
> +		dma_generic_free_coherent(dev, size, vaddr, dma_addr, attrs);
>  }
>  
>  static struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/sta2x11-fixup.c b/arch/x86/pci/sta2x11-fixup.c
> index 9d8a509..5ceda85 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/sta2x11-fixup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/sta2x11-fixup.c
> @@ -173,9 +173,7 @@ static void *sta2x11_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev,
>  {
>  	void *vaddr;
>  
> -	vaddr = dma_generic_alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, flags, attrs);
> -	if (!vaddr)
> -		vaddr = swiotlb_alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, flags);
> +	vaddr = x86_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, flags, attrs);
>  	*dma_handle = p2a(*dma_handle, to_pci_dev(dev));
>  	return vaddr;
>  }
> @@ -183,7 +181,7 @@ static void *sta2x11_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev,
>  /* We have our own dma_ops: the same as swiotlb but from alloc (above) */
>  static struct dma_map_ops sta2x11_dma_ops = {
>  	.alloc = sta2x11_swiotlb_alloc_coherent,
> -	.free = swiotlb_free_coherent,
> +	.free = x86_swiotlb_free_coherent,
>  	.map_page = swiotlb_map_page,
>  	.unmap_page = swiotlb_unmap_page,
>  	.map_sg = swiotlb_map_sg_attrs,
> diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> index a5ffd32..e7a018e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> @@ -116,4 +116,6 @@ static inline void swiotlb_free(void) { }
>  #endif
>  
>  extern void swiotlb_print_info(void);
> +extern int is_swiotlb_buffer(phys_addr_t paddr);
> +
>  #endif /* __LINUX_SWIOTLB_H */
> diff --git a/lib/swiotlb.c b/lib/swiotlb.c
> index fe978e0..6e4a798 100644
> --- a/lib/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/lib/swiotlb.c
> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ void __init swiotlb_free(void)
>  	io_tlb_nslabs = 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int is_swiotlb_buffer(phys_addr_t paddr)
> +int is_swiotlb_buffer(phys_addr_t paddr)
>  {
>  	return paddr >= io_tlb_start && paddr < io_tlb_end;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.8.3.2
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/