Re: [PATCH] NFSv4.1: new layout stateid can not be overwrite by oneout of date

From: Trond Myklebust
Date: Mon Jan 20 2014 - 18:23:27 EST


On Mon, 2014-01-20 at 16:15 +0800, shaobingqing wrote:
> If initiate_file_draining returned NFS4ERR_DELAY, all the lsegs of
> a file might be released before the retrying cb_layout request arriving
> at the client. In this situation, layoutget request of the file will
> use open stateid to obtain a new layout stateid. And if the retrying
> cb_layout request arrived at the client after the layoutget reply,
> new layout stateid would be overwrite by one out of date.
>
> Signed-off-by: shaobingqing <shaobingqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfs/callback_proc.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
> index ae2e87b..98fed13 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c
> @@ -174,7 +174,9 @@ static u32 initiate_file_draining(struct nfs_client *clp,
> rv = NFS4ERR_DELAY;
> else
> rv = NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT;
> - pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, &args->cbl_stateid, true);
> + if (memcmp(args->cbl_stateid.other, lo->plh_stateid.other,
> + NFS4_STATEID_OTHER_SIZE) == 0)
> + pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, &args->cbl_stateid, true);

Well... We shouldn't really be calling
pnfs_mark_matching_lsegs_invalid() either in this case...

> spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
> pnfs_free_lseg_list(&free_me_list);
> pnfs_put_layout_hdr(lo);


--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/