Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: Cleanup nvme_dev_start() and fix IRQ leak

From: Keith Busch
Date: Tue Jan 21 2014 - 14:06:30 EST


On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
This is an attempt to make handling of admin queue in a
single scope. This update also fixes a IRQ leak in case
nvme_setup_io_queues() failed to allocate enough iomem
and bailed out with -ENOMEM errno.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

+static void nvme_teardown_admin_queue(struct nvme_dev *dev)
+{
+ nvme_disable_queue(dev, 0);
+ nvme_free_queue(dev->queues[0]);
+}

@@ -2402,11 +2398,20 @@ static int nvme_dev_start(struct nvme_dev *dev)
list_add(&dev->node, &dev_list);
spin_unlock(&dev_list_lock);

- result = nvme_setup_io_queues(dev);
- if (result && result != -EBUSY)
+ result = set_queue_count(dev, num_online_cpus());
+ if (result == -EBUSY)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
+ nvme_teardown_admin_queue(dev);

Oh no! Your new teardown function is freeing the admin queue, but it
would be used immediatly after that in nvme_setup_io_queues ...

+
+ if (result)
goto disable;

... but you'll never actually get to setup io queues because the 'result'
here is non-zero if we were successful, and is the number of queues the
controller can allocate. I think you meant to do this instead:

+ if (result < 0)


- return result;
+ result = nvme_setup_io_queues(dev, result);
+ if (result)
+ goto disable;
+
+ return 0;

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/