Re: [lm-sensors] lm90 driver no longer working on PCs in 3.13

[Mark Brown]

On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 02:04:06PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> I think I have a better idea: Surround the regulator code, or at least
> its error handling, in the lm90 driver with

> 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) {
> 	}

> Would that be ok ? If yes I'll submit a patch. I'll do the same in
> another driver I am working on.

That's not going to have the desired effect in cases where DT is built
into the kernel but not in use on the current system (which is a
configuration that gets used) and will remove error handling for non-DT
systems that do have regulators set up.  There's not the relationship
between this and DT that you seem think there is...

Besides, if we're going to do a bodge like that we should do it in the
core and not in individual callers.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature