Re: [PATCH] x86, perf, p4: Counter corruption when using lots ofperf groups

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:37:50PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> On a P4 box stressing perf with
> 
> ./perf record -o perf.data ./perf stat -v ./perf bench all
> 
> it was noticed that a slew of unknown NMIs would pop out rather quickly.
> 
> Painfully debugging this ancient platform, led me to notice cross cpu counter
> corruption.
> 
> The P4 machine is special in that it has 18 counters, half are used for cpu0
> and the other half is for cpu1 (or all 18 if hyperthreading is disabled).  But
> the splitting of the counters has to be actively managed by the software.
> 
> In this particular bug, one of the cpu0 specific counters was being used by
> cpu1 and caused all sorts of random unknown nmis.
> 
> I am not entirely sure on the corruption path, but what happens is:
> 
> o perf schedules a group with p4_pmu_schedule_events()
> o inside p4_pmu_schedule_events(), it notices an hwc pointer is being reused
>   but for a different cpu, so it 'swaps' the config bits and returns the
>   updated 'assign' array with a _new_ index.
> o perf schedules another group with p4_pmu_schedule_events()
> o inside p4_pmu_schedule_events(), it notices an hwc pointer is being reused
>   (the same one as above) but for the _same_ cpu [BUG!!], so it updates the
>   'assign' array to use the _old_ (wrong cpu) index because the _new_ index is in
>   an earlier part of the 'assign' array (and hasn't been committed yet).
> o perf commits the transaction using the wrong index and corrupts the other cpu

Thanks for the fix Don! I fear I won't be able to look precisely tonight, so
could it wait until tomorrow? (If it's critical sure such fix should do the
trick).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/