Re: [RFC PATCH] net: core: move core networking work to power efficientworkqueue

From: Antonio Quartulli
Date: Thu Jan 30 2014 - 19:50:23 EST


On 31/01/14 01:33, Zoran Markovic wrote:
> From: Shaibal Dutta <shaibal.dutta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

[...]

> - schedule_delayed_work(&linkwatch_work, delay);
> + queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
> + &linkwatch_work, delay);

before talking about technical details, here and in other spots of this
patch the alignment is wrong. I think checkpatch should have said
something about it. The first parameter on the new line should be
aligned up to the column after the opening parenthesis.

Regards,

> }
>
>
> diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
> index c03f3de..2c8f839 100644
> --- a/net/core/netpoll.c
> +++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,8 @@ static void queue_process(struct work_struct *work)
> __netif_tx_unlock(txq);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> - schedule_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work, HZ/10);
> + queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
> + &npinfo->tx_work, HZ/10);
> return;
> }
> __netif_tx_unlock(txq);
> @@ -423,7 +424,8 @@ void netpoll_send_skb_on_dev(struct netpoll *np, struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> if (status != NETDEV_TX_OK) {
> skb_queue_tail(&npinfo->txq, skb);
> - schedule_delayed_work(&npinfo->tx_work,0);
> + queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
> + &npinfo->tx_work, 0);
> }
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(netpoll_send_skb_on_dev);
>


--
Antonio Quartulli

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature