Re: [PATCH 2/2] timer: really raise softirq if there is irq_workto do

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 01/31/2014 06:07 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> The bug that I found is that if there *are* active timers, but they
> have not expired yet. Why is this a problem? Because in that case we do

Argh, right. But your patch looks also way better. After I made I was
not too happy about that amount of ifdef and wanted to redo it later.
What you just posted is a way better solution.

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/