Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: viperboard: Call platform_set_drvdata beforedevm_iio_device_register

From: Johannes Thumshirn
Date: Sat Feb 01 2014 - 09:49:50 EST


On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 03:46:05PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 02/01/2014 03:39 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > Call platform_set_drvdata before devm_iio_device_register to avoid possible
> > race condition when accessing driver data.
>
> I don't think the driver data is accessed from within any of the IIO device
> callbacks. In fact I don't think it is accessed at all with the latest
> conversion to devm_iio_device_register(). So I think the call to
> platform_set_drvdata can just be removed.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <morbidrsa@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/adc/viperboard_adc.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/viperboard_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/viperboard_adc.c
> > index d0add8f..7d9bd05 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/viperboard_adc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/viperboard_adc.c
> > @@ -133,14 +133,14 @@ static int vprbrd_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > indio_dev->channels = vprbrd_adc_iio_channels;
> > indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(vprbrd_adc_iio_channels);
> >
> > + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, indio_dev);
> > +
> > ret = devm_iio_device_register(&pdev->dev, indio_dev);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not register iio (adc)");
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, indio_dev);
> > -
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> >
>

Looks like you're right. So we can drop this patch and I'll make a remove version.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/