Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] epoll: read(),write(),ioctl() interface

From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Mon Feb 03 2014 - 17:06:31 EST


On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> On 02/02/2014 06:17 PM, Nathaniel Yazdani wrote:
>> > So are you saying that those features you mentioned are specifically sought
>> > after for the kernel? If so I'd like to take a crack at some of them,
>> > may as well
>> > get some use out of my new knowledge of epoll internals :)
>>
>> If by "sought after", you mean "is there at least one epoll user who
>> wants them", then yes :)
>>
>> I think that EPOLLET and EPOLLONESHOT are giant hacks, and that what
>> everyone really wants is the ability to very efficiently toggle events
>> on and off. The ability to do it simultaneously and inexpensively
>> with epoll_wait would make it happen.
>
> Everybody using single-threaded epoll, you mean? I suppose there's
> quite a few of those.
>
> I've pondered an epoll_xchg syscall which would behave like *BSD kevent
> to satisfy single-threaded users, but never got around to it. All my
> epoll uses are multithreaded w/ oneshot nowadays, so xchg would only
> save one syscall per thread.

Even for multithreaded, the ability to rearm EPOLLONESHOT entries
without extra syscalls would probably be useful.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/