[PATCH 11/51] s390, smp: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration

From: Srivatsa S. Bhat
Date: Wed Feb 05 2014 - 17:12:06 EST


Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:

get_online_cpus();

for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);

register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

put_online_cpus();

This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).

Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:

cpu_maps_update_begin();

for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);

/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

cpu_maps_update_done();


Fix the smp code in s390 by using this latter form of callback registration.

Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

arch/s390/kernel/smp.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
index a7125b6..415a44e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
@@ -1057,19 +1057,24 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(rescan, 0200, NULL, rescan_store);

static int __init s390_smp_init(void)
{
- int cpu, rc;
+ int cpu, rc = 0;

- hotcpu_notifier(smp_cpu_notify, 0);
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
rc = device_create_file(cpu_subsys.dev_root, &dev_attr_rescan);
if (rc)
return rc;
#endif
+ cpu_maps_update_begin();
for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
rc = smp_add_present_cpu(cpu);
if (rc)
- return rc;
+ goto out;
}
- return 0;
+
+ __hotcpu_notifier(smp_cpu_notify, 0);
+
+out:
+ cpu_maps_update_done();
+ return rc;
}
subsys_initcall(s390_smp_init);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/