Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Torvald Riegel wrote:

> I think that if we have different options, there needs to be agreement
> on which to choose across the compilers, at the very least.  I don't
> quite know how this looks like for GCC and LLVM, for example.

I'm not sure we even necessarily get compatibility for the alignment of 
_Atomic types yet (and no ABI document I've seen discusses that issue).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/