Re: [PATCH v2] SUNRPC: Allow one callback request to be receivedfrom two sk_buff

From: Sergei Shtylyov
Date: Sat Feb 08 2014 - 14:14:24 EST


Hello.

On 08-02-2014 6:29, shaobingqing wrote:

In current code, there only one struct rpc_rqst is prealloced. If one
callback request is received from two sk_buff, the xprt_alloc_bc_request
would be execute two times with the same transport->xid. The first time
xprt_alloc_bc_request will alloc one struct rpc_rqst and the TCP_RCV_COPY_DATA
bit of transport->tcp_flags will not be cleared. The second time
xprt_alloc_bc_request could not alloc struct rpc_rqst any more and NULL
pointer will be returned, then xprt_force_disconnect occur. I think one
callback request can be allowed to be received from two sk_buff.

Signed-off-by: shaobingqing <shaobingqing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]

diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
index cec7b9b..82bfe01 100644
--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h
@@ -211,6 +211,7 @@ struct rpc_xprt {
* items */
struct list_head bc_pa_list; /* List of preallocated
* backchannel rpc_rqst's */
+ struct rpc_rqst *req_first;

Please align the variable name with the ones above and below.

#endif /* CONFIG_SUNRPC_BACKCHANNEL */
struct list_head recv;

[...]
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
index ee03d35..c43dca4 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtsock.c
@@ -1272,7 +1272,16 @@ static inline int xs_tcp_read_callback(struct rpc_xprt *xprt,
container_of(xprt, struct sock_xprt, xprt);
struct rpc_rqst *req;

- req = xprt_alloc_bc_request(xprt);
+ if (xprt->req_first != NULL &&
+ xprt->req_first->rq_xid == transport->tcp_xid) {

The continuation line should be aligned right under 'xprt' on the broken up line, according to the networking coding style.

+ req = xprt->req_first;
+ } else if (xprt->req_first != NULL &&
+ xprt->req_first->rq_xid != transport->tcp_xid) {

Same here.

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/