Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuffto make it more arch-independent
From: Lan Tianyu
Date: Sun Feb 09 2014 - 21:21:19 EST
2014-02-08 21:10 GMT+08:00 Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> _PDC related stuff in processor_core.c is little bit X86/IA64 dependent,
> rework the code to make it more arch-independent, no functional change
> in this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h | 5 +----
> arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 19 +------------------
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 19 +------------------
> 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
> index d651102..d2b8b9d 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -152,10 +152,7 @@ extern int __initdata nid_to_pxm_map[MAX_NUMNODES];
> #endif
>
> static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void) { return true; }
> -static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
> -{
> - buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
> -}
> +extern void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf);
>
> #define acpi_unlazy_tlb(x)
>
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
> index 07d209c..d71f64a 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -1014,3 +1014,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_unregister_ioapic);
> * TBD when when IA64 starts to support suspend...
> */
> int acpi_suspend_lowlevel(void) { return 0; }
> +
> +void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
> +{
> + /* Enable coordination with firmware's _TSD info */
> + buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD;
Hi Hanjun:
You can write like this.
buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD | ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
> + if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_NOMWAIT) {
> + /*
> + * If mwait is disabled for CPU C-states, the C2C3_FFH access
> + * mode will be disabled in the parameter of _PDC object.
> + * Of course C1_FFH access mode will also be disabled.
> + */
> + buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH | ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH);
> +
> + }
> +
> + buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SMP;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
> index c8c1e70..e9f71bc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
> @@ -147,24 +147,7 @@ static inline bool arch_has_acpi_pdc(void)
> c->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR);
> }
>
> -static inline void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
> -{
> - struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
> -
> - buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP;
> -
> - if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
> - buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP;
> -
> - if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
> - buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
> -
> - /*
> - * If mwait/monitor is unsupported, C2/C3_FFH will be disabled
> - */
> - if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
> - buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
> -}
> +extern void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf);
>
> #else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> index e69182f..aa9aed9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,37 @@
> #include <asm/mwait.h>
> #include <asm/special_insns.h>
>
> +void arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
> +{
> + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
> +
> + /* Enable coordination with firmware's _TSD info */
> + buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD;
> + if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_NOMWAIT) {
> + /*
> + * If mwait is disabled for CPU C-states, the C2C3_FFH access
> + * mode will be disabled in the parameter of _PDC object.
> + * Of course C1_FFH access mode will also be disabled.
> + */
> + buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH | ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH);
> +
> + }
> +
> + buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP;
This is not right. ACPI_PDC_C_CAPABILITY_SMP contians ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH and
ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH. boot_option_idle_override is meaningless here.
You should keep original order and put the check at last.
> +
> + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_EST))
> + buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_EST_CAPABILITY_SWSMP;
> +
> + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_ACPI))
> + buf[2] |= ACPI_PDC_T_FFH;
> +
> + /*
> + * If mwait/monitor is unsupported, C2/C3_FFH will be disabled
> + */
> + if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_MWAIT))
> + buf[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Initialize bm_flags based on the CPU cache properties
> * On SMP it depends on cache configuration
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> index 01b2656..31a4281 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
> @@ -255,9 +255,6 @@ static void acpi_set_pdc_bits(u32 *buf)
> buf[0] = ACPI_PDC_REVISION_ID;
> buf[1] = 1;
>
> - /* Enable coordination with firmware's _TSD info */
> - buf[2] = ACPI_PDC_SMP_T_SWCOORD;
> -
> /* Twiddle arch-specific bits needed for _PDC */
> arch_acpi_set_pdc_bits(buf);
> }
> @@ -282,7 +279,7 @@ static struct acpi_object_list *acpi_processor_alloc_pdc(void)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> - buf = kmalloc(12, GFP_KERNEL);
> + buf = kzalloc(12, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!buf) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "Memory allocation error\n");
> kfree(obj);
> @@ -310,20 +307,6 @@ acpi_processor_eval_pdc(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_object_list *pdc_in)
> {
> acpi_status status = AE_OK;
>
> - if (boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_NOMWAIT) {
> - /*
> - * If mwait is disabled for CPU C-states, the C2C3_FFH access
> - * mode will be disabled in the parameter of _PDC object.
> - * Of course C1_FFH access mode will also be disabled.
> - */
> - union acpi_object *obj;
> - u32 *buffer = NULL;
> -
> - obj = pdc_in->pointer;
> - buffer = (u32 *)(obj->buffer.pointer);
> - buffer[2] &= ~(ACPI_PDC_C_C2C3_FFH | ACPI_PDC_C_C1_FFH);
> -
> - }
> status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_PDC", pdc_in, NULL);
>
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Best regards
Tianyu Lan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/