Re: x86_pmu_start WARN_ON.

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 03:18:38PM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
> I've applied the patch and have been unable to trigger the warning with 
> either my testcase or a few hours of fuzzing.

Yay.

> My only comment on the patch is it could always use some comments.
> 
> The perf_event code is really hard to follow as is, without adding
> more uncommented special cases.

Does the below help a bit? Or is there anywhere in particular you want
more comments?

---
Subject: perf, x86: Add a few more comments
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Feb 24 12:26:21 CET 2014

Add a few comments on the ->add(), ->del() and ->*_txn()
implementation.

Requested-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c |   49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h |    8 +++---
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -892,7 +892,6 @@ static void x86_pmu_enable(struct pmu *p
 		 * hw_perf_group_sched_in() or x86_pmu_enable()
 		 *
 		 * step1: save events moving to new counters
-		 * step2: reprogram moved events into new counters
 		 */
 		for (i = 0; i < n_running; i++) {
 			event = cpuc->event_list[i];
@@ -918,6 +917,9 @@ static void x86_pmu_enable(struct pmu *p
 			x86_pmu_stop(event, PERF_EF_UPDATE);
 		}
 
+		/*
+		 * step2: reprogram moved events into new counters
+		 */
 		for (i = 0; i < cpuc->n_events; i++) {
 			event = cpuc->event_list[i];
 			hwc = &event->hw;
@@ -1043,7 +1045,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_add(struct perf_event
 	/*
 	 * If group events scheduling transaction was started,
 	 * skip the schedulability test here, it will be performed
-	 * at commit time (->commit_txn) as a whole
+	 * at commit time (->commit_txn) as a whole.
 	 */
 	if (cpuc->group_flag & PERF_EVENT_TXN)
 		goto done_collect;
@@ -1058,6 +1060,10 @@ static int x86_pmu_add(struct perf_event
 	memcpy(cpuc->assign, assign, n*sizeof(int));
 
 done_collect:
+	/*
+	 * Commit the collect_events() state. See x86_pmu_del() and
+	 * x86_pmu_*_txn().
+	 */
 	cpuc->n_events = n;
 	cpuc->n_added += n - n0;
 	cpuc->n_txn += n - n0;
@@ -1183,28 +1189,38 @@ static void x86_pmu_del(struct perf_even
 	 * If we're called during a txn, we don't need to do anything.
 	 * The events never got scheduled and ->cancel_txn will truncate
 	 * the event_list.
+	 *
+	 * XXX assumes any ->del() called during a TXN will only be on
+	 * an event added during that same TXN.
 	 */
 	if (cpuc->group_flag & PERF_EVENT_TXN)
 		return;
 
+	/*
+	 * Not a TXN, therefore cleanup properly.
+	 */
 	x86_pmu_stop(event, PERF_EF_UPDATE);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < cpuc->n_events; i++) {
-		if (event == cpuc->event_list[i]) {
-
-			if (i >= cpuc->n_events - cpuc->n_added)
-				--cpuc->n_added;
+		if (event == cpuc->event_list[i])
+			break;
+	}
 
-			if (x86_pmu.put_event_constraints)
-				x86_pmu.put_event_constraints(cpuc, event);
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(i == cpuc->n_events)) /* called ->del() without ->add() ? */
+		return;
 
-			while (++i < cpuc->n_events)
-				cpuc->event_list[i-1] = cpuc->event_list[i];
+	/* If we have a newly added event; make sure to decrease n_added. */
+	if (i >= cpuc->n_events - cpuc->n_added)
+		--cpuc->n_added;
+
+	if (x86_pmu.put_event_constraints)
+		x86_pmu.put_event_constraints(cpuc, event);
+
+	/* Delete the array entry. */
+	while (++i < cpuc->n_events)
+		cpuc->event_list[i-1] = cpuc->event_list[i];
+	--cpuc->n_events;
 
-			--cpuc->n_events;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
 	perf_event_update_userpage(event);
 }
 
@@ -1598,7 +1614,8 @@ static void x86_pmu_cancel_txn(struct pm
 {
 	__this_cpu_and(cpu_hw_events.group_flag, ~PERF_EVENT_TXN);
 	/*
-	 * Truncate the collected events.
+	 * Truncate collected array by the number of events added in this
+	 * transaction. See x86_pmu_add() and x86_pmu_*_txn().
 	 */
 	__this_cpu_sub(cpu_hw_events.n_added, __this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.n_txn));
 	__this_cpu_sub(cpu_hw_events.n_events, __this_cpu_read(cpu_hw_events.n_txn));
@@ -1609,6 +1626,8 @@ static void x86_pmu_cancel_txn(struct pm
  * Commit group events scheduling transaction
  * Perform the group schedulability test as a whole
  * Return 0 if success
+ *
+ * Does not cancel the transaction on failure; expects the caller to do this.
  */
 static int x86_pmu_commit_txn(struct pmu *pmu)
 {
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -130,9 +130,11 @@ struct cpu_hw_events {
 	unsigned long		running[BITS_TO_LONGS(X86_PMC_IDX_MAX)];
 	int			enabled;
 
-	int			n_events;
-	int			n_added;
-	int			n_txn;
+	int			n_events; /* the # of events in the below arrays */
+	int			n_added;  /* the # last events in the below arrays;
+					     they've never been enabled yet */
+	int			n_txn;    /* the # last events in the below arrays;
+					     added in the current transaction */
 	int			assign[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX]; /* event to counter assignment */
 	u64			tags[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX];
 	struct perf_event	*event_list[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX]; /* in enabled order */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/