Re: [patch 03/26] powerpc: eeh: Kill another abuse of irq_desc

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 09:40:09PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >commit 91150af3a (powerpc/eeh: Fix unbalanced enable for IRQ) is
> >another brilliant example of trainwreck engineering.
> >
> >The patch "fixes" the issue of an unbalanced call to irq_enable()
> >which causes a prominent warning by checking the disabled state of the
> >interrupt line and call conditionally into the core code.
> >
> >This is wrong in two aspects:
> >
> >1) The warning is there to tell users, that they need to fix their
> >   asymetric enable/disable patterns by finding the root cause and
> >   solving it there.
> >
> >   It's definitely not meant to work around it by conditionally
> >   calling into the core code depending on the random state of the irq
> >   line.
> >
> >   Asymetric irq_disable/enable calls are a clear sign of wrong usage
> >   of the interfaces which have to be cured at the root and not by
> >   somehow hacking around it.
> >
> >2) The abuse of core internal data structure instead of using the
> >   proper interfaces for retrieving the information for the 'hack
> >   around'
> >
> >   irq_desc is core internal and it's clear enough stated.
> >
> >Replace at least the irq_desc abuse with the proper functions and add
> >a big fat comment why this is absurd and completely wrong.
> >
> 
> Thanks for pointing it out. I think we might have this patch for now
> and I'll look into individual drivers to fix the unbalanced function
> calls later one by one.

Fine with me. You wont escape my scan scripts :)

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/