Re: [RFC PATCH] rcu: move SRCU grace period work to power efficient workqueue

[Mike Galbraith]

On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 09:55 -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:

> Yeah, my patch only addresses the nohz_full case, but since there
> doesn't seem to be any general agreemenet about the generic case, it
> seems that exposing all unbound workqueues via WQ_SYSFS is the way to
> go.  
> 
> Mike, looks like you may have started on that.  Did it get any further?

No, work gets in the way of tinker time.  Not sure which way I want to
explore anyway.  On the one hand, auto-quiesce thingy tied to domain
construction/destruction sounds good, but on the other, just handing
control to the user is highly attractive.. likely lots simpler too.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/