Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Return error if ->get() failed in cpufreq_update_policy()

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Tue Feb 25 2014 - 09:43:04 EST


On 25 February 2014 18:40, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Well, why exactly does the core need to operate "current frequency" at all?

I don't think I understood what you meant here. Do you mean why should
we maintain policy->cur?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/