Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE

From: Mathieu Desnoyers
Date: Wed Feb 26 2014 - 07:55:31 EST


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rusty Russell" <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Johannes Berg" <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "David
> Howells" <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:51:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
>
> Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Going on a tangent here - our use case is using backported upstream
> > kernel modules (https://backports.wiki.kernel.org/) for delivering a
> > driver to people who decided that they absolutely need to run with some
> > random kernel (e.g. 3.10) but we don't yet support all the driver
> > features they want/need in the kernel they picked.
>
> Ah, a user! See, that's not the "I forgot to sign my modules" case the
> others were complaining about.
>
> > We push our code upstream as soon as we can and typically only diverge
> > from upstream by a few patches, so saying things like "crap" or "felony
> > law breaker" about out-of-tree modules in general makes me furious.
>
> Appreciated and understood.
>
> I have applied Mathieu's patch to my pending tree, with Ingo's Nack
> recorded.

Hi Rusty,

That RFC patch was superseded by a newer version, posted in a separate thread.
There were documentation and other printout sites to update. I posted the
non-RFC version of the patch here:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/14/4

(you should have it in your inbox)

Please let me know if I need to repost it.

Thanks!

Mathieu

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/