Re: [PATCH v3 00/14] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'm suggesting a perf event option, just like the way that PEBS works.
>
> Right now it's a somewhat experimental feature and just having
> the sysctl is fine. If it turns out that is what everyone uses
> such an option could be still added later.

I'm a bit worried that the syscall will be stuck as ABI forever,
though.  Its presence will make adding a different configuration
mechanism awkward.

>
> I suspect most people would still use FP if they can, just use
> the LBRs if that doesn't work.

I wonder if anyone who uses perf for userspace profiling *ever* uses
FP and gets away with it.  There's precious little userspace software
compiled with frame pointers these days on most architectures.

I have a concrete reason for this question: it would be nice to
compile the vDSO with frame pointers off.  IIRC there would be a
significant performance gain, and I think the only thing that would
break is perf.  But it looks like perf will have nice elfutils unwind
support in 3.15, and if FP support is useless anyway...

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/