Re: The sheer number of sparse warnings in the kernel

From: Joe Perches
Date: Wed Feb 26 2014 - 20:06:50 EST


On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 16:51 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/26/2014 04:48 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > err.h could also return bool instead of long for the
> > IS_ERR and IS_ERR_OR_NULL tests.
>
> This is definitely true... although we should check that that doesn't
> make the code worse as this is used *all over* the kernel.

I tested using arch/x86/crypto/ x86-64 and 32
and there are no .o file differences using
bool or long via objdump -d new and old

> > Maybe something like this could be useful.
> >
> > Shut up the unsigned<->signed pointer conversions
> > and implicit conversions in the Makefile.
>
> Sounds like two separate patches to me.

Yeah, it was just for discussion.

I think gcc 4.8 is overly noisy about those 2.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/