Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] x86, mpx: add documentation on Intel MPX

[Ren Qiaowei]

On 02/27/2014 05:44 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/26/2014 11:17 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 02/23/2014 05:27 AM, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> > > +Bounds Directory (BD) and Bounds Tables (BT) are stored in
> > > +application memory and are allocated by the application (in case
> > > +of kernel use, the structures will be in kernel memory). The
> > > +bound directory and each instance of bound table are in contiguous
> > > +linear memory.
> >
> > Hi Qiaowei,
> >
> > Does this mean that if userspace decided to map something in the way of
> > the bounds tables that it would break MPX?
> >
> > Also, in the description, could we s/linear/virtual/?  Linear seems to
> > be the term that Intel likes to use in its documents, but we almost
> > universally call them virtual addresses in the kernel.
>
> It might be useful to clarify, though, just so noone gets confused with
> effective addresses (offsets).
Ok. Some words here come from some MPX public documents. I need to go 
through more carefully.

Thanks,
Qiaowei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/