Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/hash: fix build failure with older binutils

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 02/27/2014 09:47 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Just like for other ISA extension instruction uses we should check
> whether the assembler actually supports them. The fallback here simply
> is to encode an instruction  with fixed operands (%eax and %ecx).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Francesco Fusco <ffusco@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/