Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 12 Mar 2014 00:52:33 +0000 (UTC)
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>,
> > "Andrew Morton" <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 7:34:50 PM
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Tracepoint API doc update: data argument
> > 
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 21:04:57 -0400
> > Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Describe the @data argument (probe private data).
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 38516ab59fbc "tracing: Let tracepoints have data passed to
> > > tracepoint callbacks"
> > > CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > No signed-off-by.
> 
> Hi Steven,
> 
> I'm curious to understand the reason of this "no signed-off-by" on a trivial
> patch that fixes the missing DocBook comments for one of your previous
> commits that has been upstream for a few years. What am I missing ?
> Perhaps you meant this reply for my other documentation update patch (2/2) ?
> 

I mean, my scripts wont accept a patch that the author never added
their signed-off-by to.

In other words, resubmit, and add your own signed-off-by that happens to
be missing from this patch.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/