[PATCH 5/6] sched: Remove needless round trip nsecs <-> tick conversion of steal time

From: Frederic Weisbecker
Date: Tue Mar 11 2014 - 22:11:12 EST


When update_rq_clock_task() accounts the pending steal time for a task,
it converts the steal delta from nsecs to tick then from tick to nsecs.

There is no apparent good reason for doing that though because both
the task clock and the prev steal delta are u64 and store values
in nsecs.

So lets remove the needless conversion.

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ------
kernel/sched/sched.h | 10 ----------
2 files changed, 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index b46131e..b14a188 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -823,19 +823,13 @@ static void update_rq_clock_task(struct rq *rq, s64 delta)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING
if (static_key_false((&paravirt_steal_rq_enabled))) {
- u64 st;
-
steal = paravirt_steal_clock(cpu_of(rq));
steal -= rq->prev_steal_time_rq;

if (unlikely(steal > delta))
steal = delta;

- st = steal_ticks(steal);
- steal = st * TICK_NSEC;
-
rq->prev_steal_time_rq += steal;
-
delta -= steal;
}
#endif
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index c2119fd..5ec9910 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1214,16 +1214,6 @@ extern void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq);

extern void init_task_runnable_average(struct task_struct *p);

-#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
-static inline u64 steal_ticks(u64 steal)
-{
- if (unlikely(steal > NSEC_PER_SEC))
- return div_u64(steal, TICK_NSEC);
-
- return __iter_div_u64_rem(steal, TICK_NSEC, &steal);
-}
-#endif
-
static inline void inc_nr_running(struct rq *rq)
{
rq->nr_running++;
--
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/