Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Remove unnecessary braces

From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Wed Mar 19 2014 - 18:30:17 EST


On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 11:33:00 PM Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> Remove 3 sets of unnecessary braces
>
> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 11 ++++-------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 1eafd8c..ca3c01f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -1325,17 +1325,16 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev_prepare(struct device *dev,
> cpus = cpumask_weight(policy->cpus);
> up_read(&policy->rwsem);
>
> - if (cpu != policy->cpu) {
> + if (cpu != policy->cpu)
> sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "cpufreq");
> - } else if (cpus > 1) {

These braces aren't in fact unnecessary, they are in accordance with CodingStyle.

> + else if (cpus > 1) {
> new_cpu = cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu(policy, cpu);
> if (new_cpu >= 0) {
> update_policy_cpu(policy, new_cpu);
>
> - if (!cpufreq_suspended) {
> + if (!cpufreq_suspended)
> pr_debug("%s: policy Kobject moved to cpu: %d from: %d\n",
> __func__, new_cpu, cpu);
> - }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2158,11 +2157,9 @@ int cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
> if (!policy->cur) {
> pr_debug("Driver did not initialize current freq\n");
> policy->cur = new_policy.cur;
> - } else {
> - if (policy->cur != new_policy.cur && has_target())
> + } else if (policy->cur != new_policy.cur && has_target())

And here too.

> cpufreq_out_of_sync(cpu, policy->cur,
> new_policy.cur);
> - }
> }
>
> ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
>

--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/