[PATCH V2 2/4] cpufreq: don't print value of .driver_data from core

[Viresh Kumar]

CPUFreq core doesn't control value of .driver_data and this field is completely
driver specific. This can contain any value and not only indexes. For most of
the drivers, which aren't using this field, its value is zero. So, printing this
from core doesn't make any sense. Don't print it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
V1->V2: No Change

 drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
index 65a4770..53ff3c2 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
@@ -36,8 +36,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 		    && table[i].driver_data == CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ)
 			continue;
 
-		pr_debug("table entry %u: %u kHz, %u driver_data\n",
-					i, freq, table[i].driver_data);
+		pr_debug("table entry %u: %u kHz\n", i, freq);
 		if (freq < min_freq)
 			min_freq = freq;
 		if (freq > max_freq)
@@ -175,8 +174,8 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	} else
 		*index = optimal.driver_data;
 
-	pr_debug("target is %u (%u kHz, %u)\n", *index, table[*index].frequency,
-		table[*index].driver_data);
+	pr_debug("target index is %u, freq is:%u kHz\n", *index,
+		 table[*index].frequency);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/