Re: [PATCH] bonding: Inactive slaves should keep inactive flag's value to 1

From: zheng.li
Date: Mon Mar 31 2014 - 02:45:04 EST


Hi Jay,
What's you think about the new patch.

Thanks,
Zheng Li

于 2014年03月28日 17:22, Zheng Li 写道:
> In bond mode tlb and alb, inactive slaves should keep inactive flag to 1 to
> refuse to receive broadcast packets. Now, active slave send broadcast packets
> (for example ARP requests) which will arrive inactive slaves on same host from
> switch, but inactive slave's inactive flag is zero that cause bridge receive the
> broadcast packets to produce a wrong entry in forward table. Typical situation
> is domu send some ARP request which go out from dom0 bond's active slave, then
> the ARP broadcast request packets go back to inactive slave from switch, because
> the inactive slave's inactive flag is zero, kernel will receive the packets and
> pass them to bridge that cause dom0's bridge map domu's MAC address to port of
> bond, bridge should map domu's MAC to port of vif.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Li <zheng.x.li@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> index e5628fc..f97d72e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> @@ -3058,7 +3058,7 @@ static int bond_open(struct net_device *bond_dev)
> if (bond_has_slaves(bond)) {
> read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
> bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
> - if ((bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP)
> + if ((bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP || bond_is_lb(bond))
> && (slave != bond->curr_active_slave)) {
> bond_set_slave_inactive_flags(slave,
> BOND_SLAVE_NOTIFY_NOW);
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/