Re: [PATCH v2] fs: FAT: Add support for DOS 1.x formatted volumes

[Andrew Morton]

On Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:21:17 -0700 Conrad Meyer <cse.cem@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >> +     if (get_unaligned_le16(&b->sector_size) != 0 || b->sec_per_clus != 0 ||
> >> +             b->reserved != 0 || b->fats != 0 ||
> >> +             get_unaligned_le16(&b->dir_entries) != 0 ||
> >> +             get_unaligned_le16(&b->sectors) != 0 || b->media != 0 ||
> >> +             b->fat_length != 0 || b->secs_track != 0 || b->heads != 0 ||
> >> +             b->secs_track != 0 || b->heads != 0)
> >
> > Impressive!
> 
> I aim to please.

No great improvements immediately occur to me ;)

One could do

	/* nice comment */
	if (get_unaligned_le16(&b->sector_size) != 0)
		return;
	/* another nice comment */
	if (b->sec_per_clus != 0)
		return;
	...

but one would quickly run out of nice comments.

You could do s/ != 0//g.

> Not sure what would be better -- memcmp() part of the
> struct to a zeroed array?

memcmp would be hacky.  And possibly buggy if there are holes in the
struct, which is arch-dependent, shudder.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/