Re: [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation

[Waiman Long]

On 04/04/2014 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week trying
> > to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series creating the
> > equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion:
> >
> >    http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > You keep on ignoring that; I'll keep on ignoring your patches.
> >
> > I might at some point rewrite some of your pv stuff on top to get this
> > moving again, but I'm not really motivated to work with you atm.
> Uh? Did you CC also xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on your patches Peter?
> I hadn't had a chance to see or comment on them :-(

Peter's patch is a rewrite of my patches 1-4, there is no PV or unfair 
lock support in there.

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/