Re: [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Apr 04 2014 - 13:53:55 EST
* Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/04/2014 09:00 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week
> > trying to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series
> > creating the equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion:
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > You keep on ignoring that; I'll keep on ignoring your patches.
> > I might at some point rewrite some of your pv stuff on top to get
> > this moving again, but I'm not really motivated to work with you
> > atm.
> Peter, I am sorry that I have focused recently on making the
> qspinlock patch works with virtualization and it is easier for me to
> based off on my patch initially. Now the PV part is almost done, I
> will apply them on top of your patch. Hopefully, I will get a new
> patch out sometime next week.
Note that it's not "a patch" that PeterZ posted, but a series of 7
finegrained patches, each properly documented and commented. Please
preserve that work, build on top of it, and don't just ignore it!
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/