Re: [PATCH V2] workqueue: fix double unlock bug

From: Lai Jiangshan
Date: Mon Apr 14 2014 - 09:13:53 EST


On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> mutex_unlock() and put_pwq_unlocked() do not need to be called
> when alloc_unbound_pwq() is failed.
>
> And remove "if" condition for whether "pwq" is same as "wq->dfl_pwq"
> when wq_calc_node_cpumask() returns false and just use "goto use_dfl_pwq"
>
> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> V2: replace "if condition" with "goto" as Lai's comment.
>
> kernel/workqueue.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 0ee63af..9853067 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -4087,10 +4087,7 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
> if (cpumask_equal(cpumask, pwq->pool->attrs->cpumask))
> goto out_unlock;
> } else {
> - if (pwq == wq->dfl_pwq)
> - goto out_unlock;
> - else
> - goto use_dfl_pwq;
> + goto use_dfl_pwq;
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
> @@ -4100,7 +4097,7 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
> if (!pwq) {
> pr_warning("workqueue: allocation failed while updating NUMA affinity of \"%s\"\n",
> wq->name);
> - goto out_unlock;
> + return;

Please acquire the wq->mutex and goto use_dfl_pwq;

> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.7.4.4
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/