Re: [PATCH 4/4] regulator: s5m8767: Use same binding for external control as in s2mps11

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Tue Apr 15 2014 - 04:13:32 EST


On wto, 2014-04-15 at 13:26 +0530, Sachin Kamat wrote:
> On 15 April 2014 02:41, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:09:09AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >
> >> - - s5m8767,pmic-ext-control-gpios: (optional) GPIO specifier for one
> >> + - samsung,ext-control-gpios: (optional) GPIO specifier for one
> >> GPIO controlling this regulator (enable/disable); This is
> >> valid only for buck9.
> >
> > This is an incompatible change. It's OK to deprecate the old property
> > but it's bad form to just remove it.
>
> I agree with Mark. Also, there is no need to make it generic.

I thought it would be good to make it consistent and to reduce the
number of bindings with same meaning on similar drivers. However I don't
mind skipping this patch.

Thanks for applying rest of patches.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/