Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/memcontrol.c: remove meaningless while loop in mem_cgroup_iter()

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Tue Apr 22 2014 - 05:48:10 EST


On Sat 19-04-14 06:58:55, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
> Currently, the iteration job in mem_cgroup_iter() all delegates
> to __mem_cgroup_iter_next(), which will skip dead node.
>
> Thus, the outer while loop in mem_cgroup_iter() is meaningless.
> It could be proven by this:
>
> 1. memcg != NULL
> we are done, no loop needed.
> 2. memcg == NULL
> 2.1 prev != NULL, a round-trip is done, break out, no loop.
> 2.2 prev == NULL, this is impossible, since prev==NULL means
> the initial interation, it will returns memcg==root.

What about
3. last_visited == last_node in the tree

__mem_cgroup_iter_next returns NULL and the iterator would return
without visiting anything.

The patch is not correct, I am afraid.

> So, this patches remove this meaningless while loop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 29501f0..e0ce15c 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1212,6 +1212,8 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_iter(struct mem_cgroup *root,
> {
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
> struct mem_cgroup *last_visited = NULL;
> + struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_iter *uninitialized_var(iter);
> + int uninitialized_var(seq);
>
> if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> return NULL;
> @@ -1229,40 +1231,33 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_iter(struct mem_cgroup *root,
> }
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - while (!memcg) {
> - struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_iter *uninitialized_var(iter);
> - int uninitialized_var(seq);
> -
> - if (reclaim) {
> - int nid = zone_to_nid(reclaim->zone);
> - int zid = zone_idx(reclaim->zone);
> - struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
> -
> - mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(root, nid, zid);
> - iter = &mz->reclaim_iter[reclaim->priority];
> - if (prev && reclaim->generation != iter->generation) {
> - iter->last_visited = NULL;
> - goto out_unlock;
> - }
> + if (reclaim) {
> + int nid = zone_to_nid(reclaim->zone);
> + int zid = zone_idx(reclaim->zone);
> + struct mem_cgroup_per_zone *mz;
>
> - last_visited = mem_cgroup_iter_load(iter, root, &seq);
> + mz = mem_cgroup_zoneinfo(root, nid, zid);
> + iter = &mz->reclaim_iter[reclaim->priority];
> + if (prev && reclaim->generation != iter->generation) {
> + iter->last_visited = NULL;
> + goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> - memcg = __mem_cgroup_iter_next(root, last_visited);
> + last_visited = mem_cgroup_iter_load(iter, root, &seq);
> + }
>
> - if (reclaim) {
> - mem_cgroup_iter_update(iter, last_visited, memcg, root,
> - seq);
> + memcg = __mem_cgroup_iter_next(root, last_visited);
>
> - if (!memcg)
> - iter->generation++;
> - else if (!prev && memcg)
> - reclaim->generation = iter->generation;
> - }
> + if (reclaim) {
> + mem_cgroup_iter_update(iter, last_visited, memcg, root,
> + seq);
>
> - if (prev && !memcg)
> - goto out_unlock;
> + if (!memcg)
> + iter->generation++;
> + else if (!prev && memcg)
> + reclaim->generation = iter->generation;
> }
> +
> out_unlock:
> rcu_read_unlock();
> out_css_put:
> --
> 1.9.0.GIT
>

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/