Re: [Query]: hrtimers: why don't we consider hrtimers in get_next_timer_interrupt()

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Thu Apr 24 2014 - 00:44:37 EST


Hi Preeti,

On 23 April 2014 17:54, Preeti Murthy <preeti.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> In case of high resolution mode, the clock device would have
> already been programmed for the upcoming hrtimer, the last
> time the list of hrtimers was evaluated. So we have
> already taken care of hrtimers to expire next.

I actually missed this part and things look correct with this. We aren't
choosing the next device event here but just the next time we need
tick.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/