Re: [PATCH 0/5] uprobes/x86: cleanup validate_insn_* paths, fix X86_X32 case

[Jim Keniston]

On Sat, 2014-04-19 at 19:01 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Peter, feel free to ignore 1-4, but could you look at 5/5? It lacks the
> test-case because I do not have a x32-ready testing machine.
> 
> On 04/17, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > This series only fixes the problem. I'll send more changes to address
> > some of TODO's mentioned in the changelogs later. In particular, we
> > need to do something with "callw", see "Note: in 13/15.
> 
> So, what do you all think we should do with "callw"? Jim votes for
> declining to probe callw, and I fully agree.
> 
> Any objection?
> 
> Until then, lets cleanup the validate_insn_* paths and fix another bug.
> This cleanup can also simplify the next "reject callw" change.
> 
> Oleg.
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c |    7 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c    |  126 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
> 

These 5 patches are:
Reviewed-by: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@xxxxxxxxxx>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/