Re: Real-time scheduling policies and hyper-threading

[Roman Gushchin]

25.04.2014, 00:16, "Kirill Tkhai" <tkhai@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 24.04.2014, 22:59, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> [snip]
>
>>>   Does anyone use rt-scheduler for runtime-like cpu-bound tasks?
>>  So in general cpu bound tasks in the RT classes (FIFO/RR/DEADLINE) are
>>  bad and can make the system go funny.
>>
>>  For general system health it is important that various system tasks
>>  (kthreads usually) can run. Many of these kthreads run at !rt prios, and
>>  by having cpu bound tasks in rt prios they don't get to run.
>
> One more word to this. I had such expirience on 2.6.33 kernel with RT patch
> and weak hardware (sparc32).
>
> Networking was actively used and application did not use any IO operations.
>
> User needs to set all RT priorities by himself. It's necessary to set RT
> priorities at least for softirqs and rcus. RT bandwidth must be switched
> off.

I disable RT bandwidth sharing and change rt_period/rt_runtime to 1/100 ms
respectively.

Thanks,
Roman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/