Re: [RFC PATCH] mfd: pm8x41: Naive function devices registration

[Ivan T. Ivanov]

On Fri, 2014-04-25 at 08:00 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Currently functions that exist in both the controller at the
> > same address offset can not be specified with the same names.
> >
> > Adding Unique Slave ID device address to prefix function
> > device names fixes this.
> >
> > Function devices are SPMI devices, so register them on
> > SPMI bus.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/pm8x41.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 
> No, this should be fixed in the core, not the driver.

I think that at core level they are no issues. 
There is no name clashes with "top level" devices.

spmi@...{
	...
	child@0 {
	        compatible = "qcom,pm8941";
	        reg = <0x0 SPMI_USID>;

	        #address-cells = <1>;
	        #size-cells = <0>;

	        revid@100 {
	                compatible = "qcom,qpnp-revid";
	                reg = <0x100>;
	        };
	};

	child@4 {
	        compatible = "qcom,pm8841";
	        reg = <0x4 SPMI_USID>;

	        #address-cells = <1>;
	        #size-cells = <0>;

	        revid@100 {
	                compatible = "qcom,qpnp-revid";
	                reg = <0x100>;
	        };
	};
};

I don't have experience with SPMI devices, but it looks
like address partitioning is specific to this "PMIC"
controllers.

Regards,
Ivan

> 
> Rob


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/